Old Fashioned Genitals Post


















Emmed ash (—) Nowing Theta finger brashing, break finger crisht blashbrash— Peasants in minimal roles
Place them higher than that point we find that things begin to break apart
They in their location is the glue that sticks out — in our spaceship
It isnNNot— in the report but the Spaceship has folds
Innumerable folds. There are folds in the wings and spiraling undefinable into insulation
Posted by
Grant
--
13:09
0
comments
Posted by
Grant
--
17:59
0
comments
These images and videos are impossible to watch. They exists only in order to emphasize the solidarity each person must feel with another person who has placed something else totally outside of themselves. It is the purpose of a state to preserve itself, through ideology and finally through violence. But it is the bodies of the men and women who are beaten by those ideologies and bats that persist.
But that's a lie, too. It is too easy to abstract from this, to write about it as a singularity or an event, or maybe it is better put that it is too hard to speak about it as itself. It is the purpose of these videos that these bodies might persist. That their murderers, the worst kind of murderers, those who kill for ideologies that have become untenable and unreal, who think that by stabbing students or beating protesters they can return to the old world. They are wrong on two counts. The past can't be resurrected. Only a new tyranny can be installed, and it must have a greater capacity for violence and suppression. And these bodies can't be carted away. They existed, not just for the ten people who held a man while he died, or beat a defenseless man into the ground, but for everyone who encounters them in the future. It's what used to be meant by witness. They are more than just bodies at this point. They are also reminders that last week, the old order could stand on its own, people could be oppressed and still walk the streets oppressed, and this week, the regime must kill them to make them obey.
What solidarity means from this far away I don't know. It can have everything to do with a certain narcissism and a desire to become the revolutionary being while sitting still. But it can also be the limit of empathy and an absolute position against the hurt and crime being put to a people who persist, despite the men in the black masks.

Posted by
Grant
--
13:37
1 comments
The hypothesis of time travel in fiction is that to go back is to cause the future in which you, the person in question, goes back in time. One cannot go back and change things, supposedly, because then one would not exist in the proper manner or location in order to go back. This hinges on a principle of anti-paradox, yes?
Only I'm having trouble with two pieces of it. First, as we experience time linearly, it would be a totally fucked incident were we to significantly alter our exterior input experience. The fear of the anti-pardoxicals is that universal laws must necessarily exist, and violations of those laws make their fields moot, yes? Only, that's the point of doing something as fucked as time traveling in space, the new thing that we're trying for the first time. Therefore, it's probably going to cause all sorts of wicked paradoxes and other things we might not even have figured are paradoxes, but like triple level paradoxes, yeah, unrecognizably weird shit that we can't put into words. So I don't see the big reason to claim it's got to be coherent or anything.
That said, I am going to advance another of their type of theories that it isn't a paradox at all, only I'm going to expand it beyond "causing ones own oneness". Here, the problem is something like killing your mother, yes? So I go back, kill my mother, I am not born, how did I kill her. What an idiot series of events, really. What I've done, beyond wasted a time travel trip, is commit an elaborate suicide. In a normal suicide, I kill myself at one point and cease begin in point after. Here, I've killed myself, as well as all parts of myself that exist at all times. The act done, I'll die, just as in a suicide. That I'm dead doesn't mean that I can't have done the act that killed me. "The man couldn't have committed suicide, your honor, he's dead!" Let's move it slightly off suicide and matricide and toward general behavior. I commit, at timepoint B, general behavior element D. This general behavior causes me to go to timepoint A, and commit general behavior element C, yes?
First, I presume we're not significantly bound by D->C causuality, or B->A timeline, that we can imagine a universe in which the future influences the past. Second, and more interesting, is that this all presume a constantly created timeline. To elaborate. Every instant that occurs, occurs in a planned order that constitutes the existential makeup of Time, as understood here as the set of all events in a linear unchangeable order. That is to say, were an instant to be shifted or altered, it would no longer be Time, as understood here, but would instead be something else. So we need to envision this type of time, the faulty type, as being constantly produced. That this is fragile is perhaps only a point of view, it might be perfectly infinitely strong. What it lacks is its own internal logic that demands only forward-being causuality, because if I alter Time, and turn it into (time) by shifting an element, by killing my mother, by committing general behavior element c, then I've not only altered the moment and the subsequent moments, but have struck at the ontological character of Time and transformed it backwardsly.
Posted by
Grant
--
10:10
4
comments
Posted by
Grant
--
16:39
1 comments
You Read Our Books and Read Our Buildings and You Think We Were Too Dumb Too.
But we are still here
we invented the aliens you think we are.
We make pictures for you, with notes.
Posted by
Grant
--
12:50
0
comments
Darwinism must have been opposed strongly by the church and other soon after the publication of the theory. Nevertheless we have nowadays deep impressions without our private opinions taking the present world of thought by storm. At this time, the discovery of groups of the Nagaiwa minvertebratae of the author shows clearly Darwin's error quite completely. All vertebratae grow and metamorphosed from the special ovipara during the Cambrian and Ordovician periods into the adult body of the Silurian period and they that only growth of the body was left in the original forms, up to the present over a span of four hundred million years.
Observing this by body of mankind, which had grown the four limbs via the period of a man head with a dragon type bodies. There has grown a semispherical, spherical and long head according to the growth of the cerebral cortex and the four limbs had grown to be erect standing and able to walk on two feet. And so it was that mankind has developed to the complete Silurian adult with a civilization using the characteristic eyes and fingers. After that mankind had no further metamorphoses and only growth until the Recent mankind. The metamorphoses till the Silurian period were totally the same as that of the Recent embryo in the mother bodies for 280 days. This metamorphosis does not fit into the Darwinian theory.
The author has discovered more than 93 species of the Nagaiwa minivertebratae, all of which had the same corresponding species ion the extinct or Recent period and there were no new species, that is, there was no big evolution, nor metamorphosis over very long times in vertebratae bodies.
The Nagaiwa limestone contained Archaeocyathas, Orthoceras, Graptolites, Halysites and Favosites etc. with the minivertebratae, so that it must be confused that it was of the Cambrian to the Silurian periods. However, this is said to be of the upper Carboniferous age according to present geology, because it belongs to the upheaval of the geosyncline of the Japanese insular arc having Fusilina. That is, the nagaiwa district was one spot having lower and upper Paleozoic fossils in different existing at different times over a period of one hundred million years, and having no difference as far as the layers were concerned. Also the former had chiefly the land animals and the latter the aquatic.
Under such difficult circumstances the author has thus related the story of the Nagaiwa mountain and its connection with the Angara continent, at its eastern end to bring both forms to life.
In this way, the minivertebratae including the minimankind born in the old Nagaiwa district progressed westward, entered the continent and became distributed gradually all over the world, but leaving behind a part of them at the bottom of the sea of the Nagaiwa district, where long after them the geosyncline of the Honshu insular arc, possessing Fusulina was raised up. The sea bottom minivertebratae had fossilized and became elevated again, but mixed with Fusulina to become the Nagaiwa fossilized minivertebratae of the present time.
The Recent mankind theory states that the so-called races became such, as distinct units of life. However, all mankind belongs to only one species and these so-called racial forms have existed already in the period of miniman and protominiman. Therefore, it is not right, to take these various forms to be a change according to certain circumstances. They must be said rather to be a result of the survival of the fittest.
The intelligence of the minimen has become known that there was a limit to their intellectural and other faculties and that they had a religious sentiment, which is proven by the many idols they manufactured. Only mankind had a development of the cerebrum and the other animals did not. What is behind this phenomenon? The matter is wrapped up in mystery and after all we must affirm the existence of a god or creator. That the beginning of the history of mankind during four hundred million years can be seen in the religious products of miniman makes us feel the influence of religion more firmly than ever before.
Here the author decided to change the name of the Nagaiwa miniman and named it "Angara ancestor" for convenience of the following scientific and religious studies which are to follow.
Posted by
Grant
--
10:35
0
comments

Unless in expert hands, it is unadvisable to use against a staff or a stick since disarming is often only a matter of striking at the link and jerking it hard out of the hands of the practitioner
Possession is illegal in a number of countries including Belgium, Germany, Norway, Canada[15], and Spain. In the United Kingdom it is legal to own for martial arts purposes, although public possession is not allowed unless transporting between a place of training and a private address. Legality in the United States varies at state level, e.g., personal possession is illegal in New York, Arizona, California and Massachusetts, but in other states possession has not been criminalized. Legality in Australia is also determined by individual state laws. In New South Wales, the weapon is on the restricted weapons list, and thus can only be owned with a permit. In New York, attorney Jim Maloney has brought a federal constitutional challenge to the statutes that criminalize simple in-home possession for peaceful use in martial-arts practice or legal home defense.[16] As of March 2009, the case was awaiting the filing of a petition for certiorari for review by the U.S. Supreme Court, and was the subject of several legal blogs, including the Volokh Conspiracy.[17]
Posted by
E--
--
19:39
0
comments